According to Alexander, teachers and students of writing
should consider sexuality in a networked classroom because it offers
opportunities, information, and insight that may never be gathered otherwise.
Throughout the article, Alexander keeps coming back to the same theme of
opening student’s minds to see how culturally and socially conditioned their
world is. Due to straight privilege (privilege defined here as something
unasked for, not worked for, and often unknowingly receiving the benefits of)
most students are unable to ever see the other side of their arguments and
truly gain an understanding of how the marginalized group, in this case the
LGBQT community, feel and go through everyday life. Teachers must take
advantage of networked classrooms because they provide a voice for the
marginalized, endless information for the curious, and community for the
hopeless. Networked classrooms help to fight the ignorance surrounding
sexuality, and tear down the walls hiding the way society has conditioned us to
think.
Despite the fact that this piece was fantastic and
terrifically powerful without an in-depth study, I can see the benefit of
including one. Because homosexuality is unfortunately such a touchy topic,
people feel the need to have concrete facts before they can rely on
information. The excuses that people find to combat homosexuality are endless
and astounding, and a case study or something of the sort would help to debunk
some of these theories. An in-depth study could show the long term effects of
having networked classrooms, possibly following some of the students and seeing
if classrooms such as these actually do make an impact. And as I stated before,
people are more likely to believe when presented with statistics. A study like
Buck’s could also be valuable if one student, like Ronnie, was constantly
followed and analyzed, revealing the inner-workings of the mind. People may
identify with the subject followed and, as a result, come to terms with the
idea of a culturally conditioned society more easily.
I agree with your blog! I also strongly agree about why we would need an in-depth study. It would provide more hard evidence to help the reader have a better understanding (especially if the reader is against homosexuality).
ReplyDelete